Nested comments are so last century

I’ve turned off the nesting, which was down to only two levels anyway. As effortless as nesting makes it to indicate the comment you are replying to, on long threads it becomes a serious endeavour to scroll up to the “Reply” link.

It makes more sense to use a simple comment identification system on every comment. Though I suppose an upwards search would suffice. Hmm. Ah, well, moving on.

– RT

The easiest way would be for the blog to number each comment, as at Real Climate, but on this blog, every comment is marked with the date and time. Easy and natural.

Identifying comments

@Andy Feb 10, 8:28pm

  • The @ symbol is required.
  • By all means abbreviate the user name: “Richard C (NZ)” might become “RC”.
  • Feel free to omit the month and day if it is today.
  • The time is essential.

Comments welcome.

Cheers.

9
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
Richard C (NZ)Richard Treadgold Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

The comment URLs don’t work now RT i.e. we can’t cross-link to other comments in this blog or reference comments in this blog from another blog.

I cross-link a lot from other blogs to this blog, now those links are useless. And any internal cross-linking is useless. This really defeats the ability to address a specific comment URL, a powerful communication and time saving tool.

Also comment numbering, if available, e.g. Andy #12, is easier than the @ Andy timestamp stuff.

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

Flushed the cache, restarted the browser, but no joy.

I’ll try rebooting the system to reboot the browser.

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

No, rebooting didn’t work.

There was the same problem at JoNova before Jo introduced nesting. It was frustrating that we couldn’t cross-link comment URLs. Don’t why this happens at CCG and JN because SkS doesn’t have nesting but you can still access a comment by URL even if SkS Mods delete the comment (as they do) i.e. the comment is still in the blog database even though it is deleted from the thread. SkS apparently don’t know this.

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

This link doesn’t work to a comment in the old nested system:

https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/open-threads/climate/climate-science/temperature-records/comment-page-1/#comment-1283169

This link does work to the comment you made above since removing nesting:

https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/2015/02/nested-comments-are-so-last-century/comment-page-1/#comment-1283799

There’s a hotlinked CCG index in ‘Disproving AGW’ that I can no longer access directly by the URL:

https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/open-threads/climate/disproving-agw/comment-page-1/#comment-26342

The index still works because it goes to pages, not to comments.

Very useful (that index and the RSS feed are my primary CCG access) but I can’t get at it directly. The RSS feed works to individual comments because they are all now in the new format. But it didn’t work to a comment in the nested system (gone from the RSS feed now new comments have come in).

I suspect that the links that work for you RT are to comments made after the change. Those work for me too, it’s all the comments prior to the change i can’t access.

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

>”I guess you can’t access the older comments because the system has shifted them to a different page,”

Yes, that’s what it is RT. I’ve looked at some other examples and same thing. Pity, but it doesn’t matter too much because at least a broken link takes you to the right topic.

The old index link was:
https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/open-threads/climate/disproving-agw/#comment-26342

No page number, only 1 page.

New:
https://www.climateconversation.org.nz/open-threads/climate/disproving-agw/comment-page-1/#comment-26342

More than 1 page now, old link doesn’t work but still goes to the start of ‘Disproving AGW’.

Unfortunate but not something that has to be re-instated for my benefit.

Post Navigation