Climate models get energy balance wrong

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (July 26, 2011) — Data from NASA’s Terra satellite show that when the climate warms, Earth’s atmosphere is apparently more efficient at releasing energy to space than models used to forecast climate change have been programmed to “believe.”

The result is climate forecasts that are warming substantially faster than the atmosphere, says Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist in the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville.

Read more…

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
AndyMike PalinRichard C (NZ) Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

Not going down too well in certain quarters oddly. I though they would have been very relieved to know what the glitch was. Now they’ll be able to fix these embarrassments among others:- Why Are OHC Observations (0-700m) Diverging From GISS Projections? http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-are-ohc-observations-0-700m.html New Paper Illustrates Another Failure Of The IPCC Mullti-Decadal Global Model Predictions – “On the Warming In The Tropical Upper Troposphere: Models Versus Observations” By Fu Et Al 2011 http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/page/2/ My personal favourite is from Pielke Snr:- 2011 Update Of The Comparison Of Upper Ocean Heat Content Changes With The GISS Model Predictions http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/2011-update-of-the-comparison-of-upper-ocean-heat-content-changes-with-the-giss-model-predictions/ The observed best estimates of the heating and the Hansen et al prediction in Joules in the upper 700m of the ocean are given below: OBSERVED BEST ESTIMATE OF ACCUMULATION Of JOULES [assuming a baseline of zero at the end of 2002]. 2003 ~0 Joules 2004 ~0 Joules 2005 ~0 Joules 2006 ~0 Joules 2007 ~0 Joules 2008 ~0 Joules 2009 ~0 Joules 2010 ~0 Joules 2011 ~0 Joules through May 2011 2012 —– HANSEN PREDICTION OF The ACCUMULATION OF JOULES [ at a rate of 0.60 Watts per meter squared] assuming a baseline of zero… Read more »

Mike Palin
Guest
Mike Palin

For an alternative view of Spencer’s paper, check out this RealClimate post by our own Kevin Trenberth:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/07/misdiagnosis-of-surface-temperature-feedback/

By the way, Spencer’s paper appeared in an open-access journal based in China titled “Remote Sensing” that started in 2009. That journal is not listed at the ISI Web of Knowledge so there is no way to check its impact factor which is a standard for those of us in the world of academia.

Andy
Guest
Andy

Mike, I had a look at the RC link and on the3rd line I found this statement

and blogs on climate denier web sites

My policy is to hit the back button every time is see the word “denier” It indicates to me that the author is a political activist and not a scientist.

Mike Palin
Guest
Mike Palin

In this case, your assumption would be mistaken. It is an interesting analysis.

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

For an alternative view of the RealClimate post by Team member Kevin Trenberth:on Spencer’s paper [and Braswell’s], check out this post by the co-author:-

Rise of the 1st Law Deniers

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07/rise-of-the-1st-law-deniers/

And this post by the same:-

Fallout from Our Paper: The Empire Strikes Back

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2011/07/fallout-from-our-paper-the-empire-strikes-back/

Richard C (NZ)
Guest
Richard C (NZ)

Can we characterize the net flux situation as the empirical measurements of Spencer-Braswell 2010/11 (Fig 2 2011) and Knox-Douglass 2010 (Fig 1) versus stuff that Trenberth, Fasullo and Dessler made up?

Also see:-

The Saturated Greenhouse Effect

http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/The_Saturated_Greenhouse_Effect.htm

AGW Busted, basically.

Post Navigation